Are subsonic rounds legal full#
The fox collapsed on the spot without movement until I was about 20 yards away before jumping up and bolting into a ditch full of reeds. Taking a quick shot, I aimed at the head but aimed dead centre. I remember once shooting a fox during the day that was sat in a gateway watching me at around 100 yards. I've shot a few out to around 170 yards and achieved clean kills, but with a little more experience with the HMR, I'm now more inclined to say 100 yards is a more sensible limit for foxing. 17 HMR, with talk of foxes being taken at 300 yards and the such like, but in truth, although this may be achievable, the odds are you're just as likely to wound an animal at this sort of range. There are many stories of the legendary performance of the. 17 HMR is the better choice - especially if there's potential for ricochets. It's near silent and will do the job with a well-placed shot. So both have their advantages and disadvantages and it's very much a case of personal choice for general pest control, but what about purely for foxes? For discreet fox control in areas such as gardens, the. 22 LR ammunition is also considerably cheaper than that of the. 22 still has enough punch to reach out there or you could make use of high-velocity ammunition that can get it out to near HMR range with a little hold over.
That said, if you know your distances and bullet drop, the. 22, with its subsonic ammunition, may well account for more closer range targets, despite its restricted range.
For the most part, this won't make much difference, as the extra range generally makes up for the few closer pests that may be spooked by the shot - whereas the.
Are subsonic rounds legal crack#
It does, however, have a bit of a crack to it. When zeroed at 100 yards, it needs little adjustment at anything out to 150 yards, making it very forgiving and an ideal 'truck gun' for keeper and farmer alike. 22 in as much as it has a much flatter trajectory. 17 HMR is that not only is it flatter shooting, giving better range, but because it uses a ballistic tip and the bullet is travelling extremely fast it is far less likely to ricochet, instead fragmenting dramatically on impact.įor rabbits, crows and other pests, the. It's wise to use very small bits of bait or dog food to stop the fox taking a large morsel off to eat away from the backstop.Īn advantage of the. I find plastic rubble sacks ideal and would usually half-fill one on top of which the bait would be placed, then fill two or three more to stack behind that - the idea being to take the shot as the fox takes the food. I like to use a few bags of sand for this. Shooting foxes in an urban environment or anywhere where a ricochet could be a danger requires a good soft backstop to absorb the bullet once it has done its deed. 22 will undoubtably be familiar with the cowboy film style 'whizz' of a tumbling bullet speeding off in an unknown direction. Placing a shot between the eye and the ear of a fox gives an instant kill and does so with the minimum of noise using a moderated rifle and subsonic ammunition. 22 LR is the perfect tool as the range is usually around 30 yards and I need to be both quiet and discreet. I've had to shoot foxes in urban gardens in the past and the humble. Whenever possible, a centrefire for foxes is always the best choice, but sometimes the need arises to do the job discreetly or the location maybe unsafe for a high-powered centrefire rifle. Getting a result is all about being realistic with ranges and good shot placement. I've used both on many occasions and had mixed experiences of both. 22 for foxing and the answer is it very much depends on the situation. I'm often also asked what I think of both the HMR and. 17 HMR round became popular, there has been the debate as to which is better (at least for rabbiting) - the. Mark Ripley makes the case for rimfires as a specialist foxing round for situations when subtlety, safety and silence outweigh the need for pure stopping powerĮver since the.
0 kommentar(er)
